About Me

Name: Cicero390
Email: cicero390@aol.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

Why the Conservative Lost in New York 23

Why did Doug Hoffman lose in New York 23? There are three reasons.
 
1. No one knew who he was a month ago. He had a lot of ground to make up and may have run out of time.
 
2. There were questions about his residence. Some believed he was a carpet bagger and did not want to vote for him.
 
3. Hoffman did not address local issues. He attempted to nationalize the campaign. Democrat Bill Owens kept it local.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama Uses Afghan War Dead for Photo Op

After General McChrystal admitted that he spoke to President Obama exactly one time during the first seven months of the new administration, the president has done everything to show he's engaged. After being taken to task for leaving the military out to hang in Afghanistan while he decides what to do, the administration lamely explained they needed a stable government in Afghanistan. Of course, without troops, Afghanistan may never stabilize.  Now, the president decides to use returning dead for a photo op to show that he is engaged and to emphasize the agonizing decision he faces. We know the real reason Obama has not sent troops or withdrawn them. Obama does not want to lose a war, but at the same time, does not want a Vietnam-esque fiasco to derail his presidency. His reluctance to send the required troops is less about military strategy, or the political situation in Afghanistan, and more about his legacy and his agenda. Whatever the rationale for the delay, his use of dead soldiers to bolster his political situation at home is disgusting and transparent.
 
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125679653332815355.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_MIDDLTopStories
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Evolution of Halloween in America

http://www.examiner.com/x-24794-American-History-Examiner~y2009m10d29-The-Evolution-of-Halloween-in-America#
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Michael Jackson's Thriller: 25 Years Later

http://www.examiner.com/x-24794-American-History-Examiner
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Cold War Presidential Legacies: 1945-1969

The next set of presidents faced a drastically changed world. Following World War II, Europe was in shambles, the Soviet Union was throwing its weight around, and America was the last man standing. As such, the post-war presidents filled the vacuum left by collapsed European powers. America became the world’s policeman. As such, the United States moved to thwart Soviet expansionism. The U.S. did this for three reasons. First, the Soviets moved into Eastern Europe and refused to leave. Second, the Soviets’ stated purpose was worldwide revolution. Third, Hitler already plunged the world into a global conflict that took millions of lives. Stalin was not that much different than the German dictator. So, checking Soviet expansionism became a way to stop World War III.

Harry Truman was the first president to face this threat. His response was decisive and set the policy that was essentially followed by his successors through 1991. When George Kennan wrote his long telegram arguing that the U.S.S.R. respected strength and would back down if confronted, Truman made it his own. American policy toward the Russians would be based on containment. Communism would not be allowed to spread beyond its current borders. In order to achieve these ends, Truman pumped money in the form of the Marshall Plan into Europe. The plan got Western Europe back on its feet by the early fifties. He backed the Democratic forces in Greece and Turkey when Communism threatened. They survived. When North Korea invaded South Korea, Truman sent in MacArthur. Despite Chinese intervention, South Korea remained free. Despite his foreign policy achievements, including ending World War II, Truman was unpopular. Due to his low approval ratings and advanced age, he stepped down from office. However, his Containment Policy survived the Truman Presidency by forty years.

Truman’s immediate successor was General Eisenhower. Ike continued his predecessor’s policies and balanced the budget. Ike also created the Interstate Highway System which created Modern America. The system was designed with defense in mind. It ended up creating the suburbs. Americans were no longer shackled. They did not have to either live in the country or the city. They could now more easily go on cross country vacations, work far from home, and so on.

Eisenhower faced international crises as well, but being Ike, he was able to confront them and calm the nation. John F. Kennedy being John F. Kennedy, and not General Eisenhower, gave the Soviets no pause. After a failed attempt to overthrow Cuba’s Fidel Castro, the Soviets decided to place offensive nuclear missiles on the island. What followed was a textbook example of crisis management. Kennedy ordered a blockade. Technically, this was an act of war. However, Robert Kennedy was negotiating behind the scenes and an agreement was reached. The Soviets backed down. The world did not incinerate. The Soviets would remove the missiles from Cuba. The U.S. would remove antiquated missiles from Turkey. The Soviets would not mention the deal. America would not remove Castro. The Cuban Missile Crisis ended and the world survived.

While Kennedy stepped to the edge, Lyndon Johnson went over it. Lyndon Johnson managed to anger everyone. His Great Society angered Conservatives, led to large deficits in subsequent decades, and is generally considered a failure. His Civil Rights policies angered the South and sent the entire region over to the G.O.P. Freeing African-Americans (with more Republican support than Democratic) should have been his crowning glory. However, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Voting Rights Act of 1965, and Fair Housing Act of 1968 are overshadowed by Vietnam.

The Vietnam War destroyed Johnson. As it dragged on, more people became disillusioned. After three years, the administration told Americans that the war was almost over. Then, the enemy launched a daring attack on the Tet New Year. In 1968, they attacked every major city in South Vietnam and fought in the American Embassy in Saigon. The U.S. won a major victory, but it did not look like it on television. Walter Cronkite declared the war lost. Johnson later announced he would not seek another term as president. The Democratic Party after 1968 fell to the McGovernites and has yet to recover.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Kennedy Legacy

http://www.examiner.com/x-24794-American-History-Examiner~y2009m10d22-The-Kennedy-Legacy
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Top 10 Conspiracy Theories

http://www.examiner.com/x-24794-American-History-Examiner
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama vs. Fox News

Why would the White House attack Fox News? It risks angering the media as a whole. Some leftist journalists have criticized them for attacking free speech. It also risks increasing Fox's viewership. So, why attack Fox News? There are four reasons. First, it is a distraction. Obama's approval rating is under 50%, Afghanistan has gone to hell since he took office, and his health care plan is unpopular. This allows them to change the subject.  Second, it makes the base happy. The Democratic base is angry at him for not fulfilling his promises on Iraq, gay rights, and other issues. Attacking Fox could have a rallying effect. The left has been told to dislike Fox, so the rank and file dislikes Fox. Third, they can not tell the difference between opinion and reporting. Left wing journalists have inserted their opinion into news for years. As a result, the left does not see the difference between anchors and O'Reillys. Finally, the administration is just thin-skinned. They don't like criticism and feel the need to destroy its critics. There are a lot of similarities between the Obama White House and Rahm Emmanuel, and the Nixon White House and Bob Halderman. If the administration is not careful, they will destroy themselves.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1234Next »