About Me

Name: Cicero390
Email: cicero390@aol.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

Story of the Year: The Return of Terror

While President Obama wishes to focus on health care and other domestic priorities, his administration is increasingly distracted by the specter of terrorism. The terrorists are coming out of the woodwork like cockroaches. Perhaps the terrorists feel safer to emerge now that Bush is out of office. Maybe it is coincidence. Whatever the reason, the terrorists seem to be back and in force both at home and abroad.

This year, the government has broken up terror plots in Texas, New York, and killed a radical Imam in a shootout in Dearborn, Michigan. Homegrown terrorists have sought help abroad. The Pakistan Military arrested five Americans that tried to join El Queda. They should be charged with treason. There seems to be an increase in domestic arrests with would be terrorists.

While the government has broken up terror rings at home, the country suffered the first terror attack since 911. On November 5, an Islamic terrorist attacked the Fort Hood. The alleged terrorist was a soldier that could not reconcile his faith with his career. This was not the actions of a deranged lone gunman. This was thought out rationally. He decided to go on a jihad and murdered 13 and wounded 30. It appears political correctness intimidated those that could have come forward to report this fellow’s behavior. He is currently charged with 13 counts of premeditated murder and 32 counts of attempted murder under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Unfortunately, Congress refuses to hold hearings on the matter in order to avoid possible embarrassment for the Administration.

While America suffered its first terror attack on the homeland in eight years, Iraq seems relatively secured. However, the terrorists have been on the move in Afghanistan. The Pakistan military has hammered them and they have probably moved back into Afghanistan. All the while, President Obama agonized for months over a decision to send more troops to combat terrorists. He eventually decided to increase troop strength, but does not seem to know what else to do. It is entirely probable that the delay in deciding to send troops cost American lives and perhaps wasted an opportunity to nail some terrorists.

Lastly, Obama has decided to close the prison at Guantanamo Bay and ship its prisoners stateside and elsewhere. There is some concern over what happens should some of these terrorists escape. Additionally, some detainees will be tried in civilian court despite pleading guilty in military tribunals. The administration has promised convictions even if the accused are found innocent. So, the integrity of the trials are questionable at best. Meanwhile, other detainees will stay in the tribunals. In both cases, the administration is making moves for propaganda purposes.

2009 will be remembered as the year terrorism reemerged. Every couple months it seemed the government was busting up another terror ring. The country also experienced the first terror attack since 911. On top of this, Afghanistan dominated much of the news as Obama dithered on whether or not he wanted to win the war there, if the war was winnable, and what victory meant. The administration even played politics with terrorists in captivity. If 2009 is any indication, there will be an upswing in terror violence on American targets over the next couple of years.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Most Annoying Person of the Year

Now it is time for my first annual Annoying Person of the Year Award. There were about 20 contenders. I narrowed it down to ten. Here are the nominees:

1. ACORN: Now we know what community organizers do. They organize pimps and hos!

2. Anita Dunn: The former White House Communications Director loves Chairman Mao and likes to quote him to students. Mao killed 60 million.

3. Global Warming Advocates: Turns out they are not only wrong, but cooking the information as well.

4. Perez Hilton: Gets mad at Carrie Prejean for supporting “traditional” marriage, attacks Fergie, and the cries on his webcam after someone in Will.I.Am’s entourage beat him up. He was the odds on favorite to win this until recently.

5. Notre Dame University: Refusing to go to a bowl game against CMU. COWARDS!

6. Barack Obama: Barack Obama is now the most disliked president of all time at this stage of his presidency. No president has been as low in the polls 11 months into office as Obama. The stimulus failed, the job seminar was a useless photo op, he’s ignored the economy to focus on a health care plan NO ONE wants, Iran has completely snubbed him, it took forever to decide to help the troops in Afghanistan, and world leaders consider him a joke. Lastly, he keeps blaming all the world’s problems on the Republicans, but he was in Congress just as responsible as anyone else for today’s problems. On the bright side, he is going to do a holiday special with Oprah.

7. Keith Olbermann and Rachel Maddow: If you liked Joseph Goebbels and Eva Braun, these two are for you! Goebbels may have been less hateful than Olbermann.

8. Reality TV Wannabes: Balloon Boy. White House Party Crashers. One of these days, these reality star wannabes are really going to hurt someone.

9. Kanye West: How do you diss Taylor Swift??

10. Tiger Woods: This has become rather amusing. Karma strikes a true phony.

The Winner: Reality TV Wannabes!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Health Care, Geithner, et al

Item: Health Care Reform passed a key senate vote. The media is acting like they passed the bloody thing.

Analysis: This was procedural. No biggee. Just means that the forces of good will have to unite to defeat this bill later. As far as the media goes, they are trying to build momentum to help pass the bill.

Item: CBO accounting claims that the Reid Health Care Bill will cut the deficit and cost under $900 billion.

Analysis: This does not take into account the full impact of the bill which comes down the road. It also does not take into account other elements that will appear in other bills. It does estimate that health care costs will increase under the plan. The real cost will be $2.5 trillion. That will bankrupt the country. 

Item: The government recommends limited numbers of mammograms for women.

Analysis: Imagine what will happen when the full force of such recommendations take effect under Obamacare.

Item: Arlen Spector admitted Medicare will be cut to pay for health care reform.

 Analysis: They plan to kick it over to an "independent commission" to give the Democrats cover.  The GOP needs to just spell this whole thing out: Medicare cuts, increase in health care costs, rationed coverage, rampaging deficits, and it does not cover everyone. Meanwhile, Obama fiddles while the country burns under the weight of unemployment. 

Item: President Obama claims he does not want to add to the debt.

Analysis: Then why all the needless spending?

Item: Republicans and Democrats call for Treasury Secretary Geithner’s head.

Analysis: He should never have been confirmed in the first place. Geithner and the Obama Administration have yet to address the economy and have been in office almost a year. Geithner gives Congress a target and makes it look like they are doing something.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Presidential Legacies: The Post Cold War Era 1989-2009

The world remained full of challenges after the Soviet Union fell. The Balkans exploded in a fury of ethnic cleansing. China and India were joining the ranks of industrial nations. The Middle East was an even more dangerous place as Islamic nations sought nuclear weapons and harbored terrorists. Additionally, the world's economy destabilized and de-industrialized. Technological advances changed communications, journalism, commerce, warfare, and everything else. The greatest challenges for American presidents during this period turned out to be the Middle East, the changing economy, and themselves.

George H.W. Bush was not the first president to have to deal with the Middle East. Jefferson had to fight a war there in the early nineteenth century. Like Jefferson, Bush led America to war against a lawless force. Iraq invaded Kuwait in 1990. This violated the post-war international consensus against offensive wars of conquest. President Bush went to the United Nations and garnered support to remove Iraq. Despite diplomatic initiatives, Saddam Hussein dragged his feet and dug in. The American-led coalition launched an air campaign lasting four weeks. Then, ground forces routed Iraq in 100 hours. It was a dramatic victory. Shell-shocked Iraqi soldiers surrendered to news crews. Today, most view the war as necessary to stop aggression. Hussein invaded Kuwait, threatened Saudi Arabia, and had to be removed. If the world allowed the conquest to stand, others might decide to launch offensive wars. Historically, the Gulf War and Korean War are the only instances where the United Nations stopped aggression. Bush’s approval rating hit 91%.

Bush’s popularity peaked too soon. A mild economic downturn and a third party candidate doomed the Bush Administration. Bill Clinton came out of nowhere to win the presidency. The Clinton Administration faced a new enemy born out of the Gulf War. El Queda began launching attacks against American interests. At first, Clinton treated it as a law enforcement issue. Eventually, he launched missile attacks on suspected El Queda bases (and an aspirin factory). However, by that point, he was mired in scandal.

The Clinton Administration was the most scandal-ridden in history. The biggest scandal led to his impeachment. At first, an independent counsel investigated a land deal in Arkansas. The attorney general expanded the independent prosecutor's mandate to include a wide range of improprieties. Eventually, those improprieties led to Monica Lewinsky. Clinton could have escaped had he admitted the affair immediately and apologized. Instead, he lied under oath. The cover up led to his impeachment. The House of Representatives voted to impeach Clinton on the charges of perjury and obstruction of justice. Two other charges, abuse of power and perjury in a civil case, failed to pass the House. Clinton was tried in the Senate in 1999 and escape conviction and removal. However, the United States was rudderless for about a year as Clinton fought the charges. Had the president admitted the affair earlier or resigned, the country would have been better off. Instead, the battle polarized the country and allowed El Queda time to prepare for attacks on the USS Cole and 911.

Clinton’s peccadilloes severely damaged the Gore campaign. Gore did not know whether to use Clinton or to run and hide from him. The indecision doomed the campaign. Gore lost to George W. Bush. The country entered a recession in 2000 and Bush was determined to combat it. He cut taxes and then came the 911 attacks. El Queda and Osama bin Laden slaughtered 3000 people as airplanes leveled the World Trade Center in New York, struck the Pentagon, and crashed in Pennsylvania. Bush’s response to the crisis was widely lauded. His address to congress following the attacks echoed Roosevelt’s Pearl Harbor speech and his visit to Ground Zero with the bullhorn just about ensured re-election.

After a brief buildup, American forces moved into Afghanistan to battle the Taliban and El Queda. The Americans secured a temporary victory in short order. Unfortunately, Osama bin Laden escaped. Then, began to dawdle unsure what to do next. American policy in Afghanistan remains unclear to this day. Meanwhile, the Administration began focusing its attention on Iraq.

While waging war in Afghanistan, the Bush Administration prepared for another conflict. Since Saddam Hussein failed to live up to the Gulf War cease fire, the United States had the legal right to re-engage. The administration used several arguments for war including the spread of democracy and stopping the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (WMD). The greatest firestorm since Vietnam ensued. At this point, war could have been avoided had Hussein allowed weapons inspectors back into the country. He didn’t and Bush launched the Second Gulf War. Hussein was later captured and executed. No weapons were ever found despite Saddam’s past use. Hussein later admitted plans to continue a program once the heat was off.

After the invasion, Bush declared victory. However, an insurrection broke out. American policy failed to confront the insurgents. The military did not have enough boots on the ground and the American government dissolved the only entity that could have helped, the Iraqi military. The war grew increasingly unpopular. Bush remained stubborn and patiently waited for victory. Finally, in 2007, Bush launched the surge. This, combined with diplomatic initiatives, defeated the radicals. As his term expired, Bush announced American troop withdraws.

Before Bush left office, the economy collapsed. A decade old government plan required banks to lend money to low income borrowers. Congress blocked reform attempts earlier in the decade. One senator opposing those reforms was Barack Obama. Ironically, Obama’s opposition to reforms that could have stopped the meltdown, helped his election in 2008.

Upon taking office, Obama began the greatest spending spree in history. The Bush Administration and Republican Congress had created massive deficits as a result of two wars, the Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit, and insane spending. Upon assuming office, Obama turned into Bush on steroids. Instead of being pragmatic and dealing with the economy and two wars, he has been a blind ideologue. The Obama stimulus plan failed to fix the economy and cost $700 billion. He plans more spending while the dollar collapses. Unless some fiscal sanity overcomes Obama and/or the Pelosi Congress, then the Misery Index (hyperinflation and double digit unemployment) will be the result. One influential economist compared Obama’s economic policy to that of Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe. However, Obama’s Administration is just beginning and perhaps reality and common sense may strike before he can turn the U.S. into a third world country.

It is harder to discern a legacy for recent presidents. Sometimes, things ignored now become important later. For example, Clinton Administration rules forcing banks to lend to borrowers unable to repay loans led to a worldwide economic collapse. While he was in office, people celebrated Clinton's economic brilliance. Now, he is often cited as one cause of the economic collapse. In Obama’s case, he has not been in office a year yet, so he has a very limited body of work. This last grouping of presidents also provide an interesting psychological study. Clinton's inability to tell the truth and predilection for women, Bush's stubbornness, and Obama's blind adherence to a failed ideology handicapped these three chief executives. With that in mind, each president in this group dealt with the Middle East, the ups and downs of a changing economy, and with the possible exception of Bush 41, their own personality failings.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Why the Conservative Lost in New York 23

Why did Doug Hoffman lose in New York 23? There are three reasons.
 
1. No one knew who he was a month ago. He had a lot of ground to make up and may have run out of time.
 
2. There were questions about his residence. Some believed he was a carpet bagger and did not want to vote for him.
 
3. Hoffman did not address local issues. He attempted to nationalize the campaign. Democrat Bill Owens kept it local.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama Uses Afghan War Dead for Photo Op

After General McChrystal admitted that he spoke to President Obama exactly one time during the first seven months of the new administration, the president has done everything to show he's engaged. After being taken to task for leaving the military out to hang in Afghanistan while he decides what to do, the administration lamely explained they needed a stable government in Afghanistan. Of course, without troops, Afghanistan may never stabilize.  Now, the president decides to use returning dead for a photo op to show that he is engaged and to emphasize the agonizing decision he faces. We know the real reason Obama has not sent troops or withdrawn them. Obama does not want to lose a war, but at the same time, does not want a Vietnam-esque fiasco to derail his presidency. His reluctance to send the required troops is less about military strategy, or the political situation in Afghanistan, and more about his legacy and his agenda. Whatever the rationale for the delay, his use of dead soldiers to bolster his political situation at home is disgusting and transparent.
 
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125679653332815355.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_MIDDLTopStories
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama vs. Fox News

Why would the White House attack Fox News? It risks angering the media as a whole. Some leftist journalists have criticized them for attacking free speech. It also risks increasing Fox's viewership. So, why attack Fox News? There are four reasons. First, it is a distraction. Obama's approval rating is under 50%, Afghanistan has gone to hell since he took office, and his health care plan is unpopular. This allows them to change the subject.  Second, it makes the base happy. The Democratic base is angry at him for not fulfilling his promises on Iraq, gay rights, and other issues. Attacking Fox could have a rallying effect. The left has been told to dislike Fox, so the rank and file dislikes Fox. Third, they can not tell the difference between opinion and reporting. Left wing journalists have inserted their opinion into news for years. As a result, the left does not see the difference between anchors and O'Reillys. Finally, the administration is just thin-skinned. They don't like criticism and feel the need to destroy its critics. There are a lot of similarities between the Obama White House and Rahm Emmanuel, and the Nixon White House and Bob Halderman. If the administration is not careful, they will destroy themselves.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Nobel Prize Usually Goes to Accomplishment

 

No one is sure why Barack Obama won the Nobel Prize. The president seemed a bit confused himself. Despite the controversy, Obama is the third sitting president, and fourth overall, to win the Nobel Peace Prize. The first two won for their efforts toward ending conflict. The third, Jimmy Carter, won during the run up to the Iraq War in 2002. His award is perceived as a shot at George W. Bush as opposed to Carter‘s initiatives. Despite the overtly political nature of the award, Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson earned their awards for their efforts to end war.

In the summer of 1905, Russia and Japan agreed to allow Theodore Roosevelt to mediate an end to their war. The Japanese soundly defeated the Russians, but the Czar was too proud to give in. Theodore Roosevelt gave him an opening and opportunity to save face by offering to mediate a settlement. The two sides met the president in Portsmouth, New Hampshire. The Russians angered Roosevelt by refusing to seriously negotiate despite their weaken state. The military situation forced them to acquiesce to a treaty. Neither side was entirely happy with the results, but accepted the Treaty of Portsmouth.  For his efforts in ending the Russo-Japanese War, Roosevelt won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1906.

Thirteen years later, a man Roosevelt despised won the same award. Woodrow Wilson’s idealism drove the Paris Peace Conference following World War I.  His idea for an international body that could settled disputes between nations was incorporated into the Treaty of Versailles. This became the League of Nations. The League was designed to allow diplomacy to solve problems that would otherwise lead to war. Wilson’s desire for peace, ethnic self-determination, and the elimination of war combined with the creation of the League of Nations led the Nobel Committee to issue the president his peace prize.

President Obama’s Nobel Prize follows in the footsteps of his esteemed predecessors. Unfortunately, the current president’s prize seems like an award for potential as opposed to concrete accomplishment. On the other hand, Roosevelt and Wilson got in the trenches of foreign diplomacy and hammered out agreements designed to restore the peace. Roosevelt helped end a disastrous conflict in the Far East. Wilson helped end an apocalyptic conflict that engulfed the world and worked to stop future conflicts. President Obama has a lot to live up to.

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama's Accomplishments

The year is almost out. Barack Obama has been president for over eight months. He has had overwhelming majorities in congress. What has he accomplished since taking office? Nothing. Obama has ignored the economy while fixating on health care. He has also ignored foreign affairs while obsessing over so-called torture. As a result, the United States is not better off now than before. Obama has the wrong priorities and the end result could be disaster.
 
Americans took a leap of faith when they voted for the Democratic nominee. He had no experience and no qualifications for office. Odds are very good that Americans will be trying to figure out how this guy got elected fifty years down the road. His lack of experience shows. Obama was elected to fix the economy. As a result, he passed the stimulus bill. This has failed. Of course it was never meant to stimulate anything. It was a pork bill designed to pay off debts. The rest of his program is bogged down in congress and he has not done anything else to help the economy. Instead of doing what he was elected to do, he has focused on a health care plan no one wants.
 
In foreign policy, Obama has been equally incompetent. The Middle East has gotten more dangerous. Iran has been stringing everyone along so they can develop their atom bombs. Israel is now alone. Afghanistan has gotten exceedingly worse and Obama refuses to help the soldiers and commanders on the ground. Obama has abandoned Eastern Europe to Russia in the hopes he could gain their support in the Middle East. The Russians just want to string the U.S. out in the Middle East. It distracts American politicians, bureaucrats, and public and gives Putin a free hand in Eastern Europe.  
 
So, Obama has ignored American domestic policy and is running a dangerous foreign policy game. Meanwhile, his programs are running up massive deficits. Obamanomics has the world concerned. The Arab states are working to replace the dollar for oil sales. There is a strong possibility of a complete economic collapse as a result of the massive deficits and Mugabe-esque economic policies of this administration.
 
Since Obama is only in his first year, it will be a long time before help arrives. The only hope domestically is the Blue Dog Democrats. There is no hope internationally. Israel will have to act on their own to defend themselves. Afghanistan is doomed barring a miracle. Eastern Europe is in deep trouble. There has never been a president as incompetent as Barack Obama and the world will suffer for the American voters desire to elect someone without qualifications because he gives pretty speeches.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Great Moments in Liberalism

Let's take insane homicidal maniacs on field trips!
 
http://news.aol.com/article/insane-killer-phillip-arnold-paul/676297
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Government Health Care Nightmare

This is a true story. I know a retired couple.  They lived on a GM pension and GM Health Benefits. Those GM Health Benefits no longer exist because of the government sponsored bankruptcy. Essentially, Obama cut off their health benefits. When they applied for Medicaid, they were denied. So, the Obama Administration cut off their health care AND refused their Medicaid request. They need help. She needs life saving surgery, but Obama denied it. Perhaps those death panels really do exist.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12Next »